jallikattu ban
print
Jallikattu Ban: Cruelty in the name of Culture                                 Hindi

What is JalliKattu?

  • The term has originated from two words: ‘Jalli’ and ‘Kattu’.
  • These terms refer to gold or silver coins tied to the bulls’ horn.
  • The sport has three variants:
  1. A person tries to hang on a bull for a specified time or distance.
  2. A bull is released and participants try to control the animal.
  3. The bull is tied to a 50-feet rope for a team to subdue it within a specified time.

A timeline of events

  • In 2006, the Madras HC banned Jallikattu.
  • In March 2007, the Tamil Nadu government got the ban overturned which, after four months, was reimposed by the supreme court.
  • In January 2008, the apex court allowed the sport as part of pongal celebrations.
  • From 2009 till 2011, after the state government passed laws to regulate the sport, it was permitted under supervision.
  • The Supreme Court of India had banned Jallikattu in 2014. But the central government in January 2016 issued a notification permitting the exhibition and use of bulls as performing animals for Jallikattu and bullock-cart races .
  • The Supreme Court of India has pulled up the central government for its January 7 notification permitting Jallikattu despite the court’s judgement banning the bull taming sport. The court had stayed the government notification on January 12. Let us have a look at both sides of the story.

In Favour of Jallikattu

  • When humans can race, why can’t bulls?
  • Even Spain has permitted bull fighting sport in the name of cultural heritage.
  • Tales from Mahabharatha have been put forward to convince the supreme court of the sport’s ability to maintain biodiversity.
  • It encourages breeding of indigenous bulls.
  • It is an ancient tradition practiced from time immemorial and not just a sport for entertainment.
  • The ban can affect the fundamental right to life and livelihood of millions in southern India.
  • There are enough safeguards for the bulls.
  • Bulls will be slaughtered if banned.
  • The sport is a symbol of a close relationship between agriculturalists’ and their cattle.
  • Humans participate in the race without any weapons while the bull has sharp horns which can kill a person immediately. This means bulls are more capable of causing injury to humans and not the other way round.

In Favour of the Ban on Jallikattu

  • It is a cruel sport and cruelty to animals is prohibited by the law.
  • Bulls cannot be made to suffer just for the sake of human entertainment.
  • Humans run in races with their free will but bulls are forced to participate and are made to suffer unnecessary pain and suffering.
  • The bull has been classified as a draught animal not meant for running but sedate walking.
  • So what if it is an age old tradition, even child marriage was an ancient tradition until it was declared a crime.
  • Even humans are killed and many injured during bull fight.
  • Article 51A in the constitution of India deals with fundamental duties of the citizens. The 7th fundamental duty obliges us to have compassion for living creatures.
  • The SC had also expanded the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life) by including the prohibition of any disturbance to the environment, including animals, considered essential for human life.

Leave a Reply